incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benjamin Hindman <b...@berkeley.edu>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC4)
Date Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:48:28 GMT
Hi Sebb,

Thanks so much for taking a look! Responses inline.

On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:22 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman <benh@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> > (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for
> > Mesos in Apache, but the fifth release candidate.
> >
> > Vote thread on mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mesos-dev/201203.mbox/%3CCAFeOQnW7jk-VcTFpUP-_VonL99JCnggKeNPW%2BGx-Ozdy1U8sjg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The candidate for Mesos 0.9.0-incubating release is available at:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC4/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating-RC4
>
> The NOTICE file is incomplete; the product name and copyright year(s)
> are missing.
>

Thanks, I'll add that.


> The LICENSE file includes references to several 3rd party items.
> It looks like glog and utilities.cc and others may require mention in
> NOTICE.
>

Is there a document somewhere which describes when something needs to go
into NOTICE in addition to LICENSE? I had read previously read the section
titled "What Are Required Third-Party Notices?" from
http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices but I
still was unclear whether or not anything needed to be done.


> There's no DISCLAIMER file in SVN root.
>

Right, I'll add that.


> There are several 3rd party libraries in SVN under
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating-RC4/third_party/


This was deliberate, so as to make it easier to use for both developers
(who check out the repository) and users (who download a distribution). Is
there a policy against this? I saw this as analogous to distributing JARs.


Is the correct next step to cancel this vote, create a RC5, and start a new
vote thread for that? Or modify RC4?

Thank you very much!

Ben.



> > The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC4/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.md5
> >
> > The signature of the tarball can be found at:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC4/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc
> >
> > Mesos' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating!
> >
> > The vote is open until Tuesday, April 10th at 8 pm (a bit more than 72
> > hours since it's over the weekend) and passes if a majority of at least 3
> > +1 IPMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > To learn more about Apache Mesos, please see
> > http://incubator.apache.org/mesos.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message