Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F249A4C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66586 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 08:46:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66396 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 08:46:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64337 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2012 08:46:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:46:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of martijn.dashorst@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:46:00 +0000 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so2242949yhj.6 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8DHv07u4XDdyAm2y5oViY5QFE+62aqSnDlCyFLYCuKs=; b=CvPTcw6DHAhLXGR6JhJt7FkS/Yy+5yyXe4g1CmALtSRy1UeOp2C5us6VoFgzbuT2Ie bicwr8qoECodXjNcOH+a+XPc3XyUoH2omWkpdk28HxC/5f5s/dOMumJ98mTX6R4gNtuw +pGS5h1ny0jYGqJXGRUikqJmFGcxJo0dWOSUAA32J8Y3I9c/IZqDrYV5nY80hrVU0Vly t697QI2hEk/ZQoYSjDUUXWkk6ZgSZpBFxV/1gPGSACZYbZ+GmFLv9i9h7GhodQZpPIaJ hXWRDIfFmtZOB3mWze1o9C8s2rtwDd7/M1+a7s5gybIvZkWMCJm9c159BsVkyxOT9yzB cqEA== Received: by 10.236.168.41 with SMTP id j29mr12237490yhl.24.1331541939159; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:45:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.206.13 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:45:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Martijn Dashorst Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:45:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Etch status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "March2012" by michaelfitzner) To: general@incubator.apache.org, etch-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> More generally, looking over the last quarter in Etch I see ongoing >> technical work mostly by Michael Fitzner and Martin Veith but only >> occasional input from others and not much focus on community-building. >> Do you have plans on how to increase community activity and diversity, >> or are you happy with the status quo? > > Any thoughts on this from Etch mentors or the PPMC? Etch is a slow moving community. AFAICT the code is mostly done, but actively maintained. The space Etch operates in is quite crowded, so community raising efforts are difficult. The engineers working on such code are usually very busy doing other stuff rather than improving the library. I've tried to contact the most recent voted-in committer, but he has yet to respond, and do actual work on Etch. The other committers and PPMC members have either jobs that focus on implementing things other than directly working with Etch, meaning that Etch development only happens when they return to a part that uses it. For example the suitable name search is currently undergoing, but finding time to complete it is difficult. Trying to build a community around a networking stack is difficult, especially this one with its history. The original company open sourcing Etch disbanded the development team when no diversity was present, blowing up the project. I don't blame the company: they have to do what is best for them. Unfortunately it did severe damage to the community. IMO they should have a great community opportunity in the automotive industry (the active contributors are from a large 3-letter car manufacturer in Germany). My expectation is that this industry (in Germany) could expand the community with 3 or 4 committers. Raising awareness by publishing an article about Etch in automotive engineering magazines should help. I don't expect miracles to happen, but if one or two companies start looking into etch, the diversity and activity might just increase a bit. I've asked the guys to try to write one or two articles in German magazines to raise awareness. Unfortunately that has taken quite some time, but what I hear is that they are in the final stages. I was hoping that the new committer would become active, and that graduating Etch would be around the corner. It appears that we need other new blood to invigorate the community. Martijn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org