Return-Path: 
 <general-return-34958-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 311EE9B51
	for <apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:31:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 80744 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 01:31:52 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80590 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 01:31:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80573 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 01:31:52 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:31:52 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:31:45 +0000
Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so15979bkc.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8nYstBwU+5Yv2ObpoFA2LcjGZ+Zu9SoG7gg43JYI7GY=;
        b=T4Z9ZtjvLUhdkAhmLtQuE2Ran6bcn7rUBl/inL5T+v0NZ/YD4B/h30rWZ4n16Ri82x
         jzKUJQGHeQB2TdJ+IpcrH2P6zZ7+P44mcBp3lPmQU71lIIRFInt/8o6qEPTZgTJQhIpX
         5WsG5SXIJpCWfq9AP+4YvQO4dTnsMzppaGQa7K/Vuky7lCGZPz9RvtZ8ssGCXnctfZ+C
         ln5jwNyEqWSXy5GmSZpND0OpD56waMa+Zjnm6mbEMw0o7781Ti2C8HONf0Vb1GNkzwMF
         6+171/TepThAaqHQwUI7TTWGFVSdZJy0njIc1ZRkxsiMCYSEG3WBGbQuEO4EqnCgwZLu
         tdEQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.148.89 with SMTP id o25mr5693749bkv.52.1331602284144; Mon,
 12 Mar 2012 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.62.82 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F5E667D.4070208@apache.org>
References: 
 <CADB+nT=Cmc6qtfW-v5Y=XkCnoEUHm5Wa--OceGdSNzUphB9LrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F5E667D.4070208@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:31:24 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: bwCC2LvOkEzsStTrmXU8xLCBFGw
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+v8CZQ2MK+SW2_CfpXFSz-wH_ZQQWhfpwe+ktVEhrOEog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.3.0-incubating
From: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Mah=E9?= <bmahe@apache.org>
Cc: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Bruno Mah=E9 <bmahe@apache.org> wrote:
> I have started testing this release yesterday by doing a full deployment
> / tests.

Perfect start! I'll be doing some testing in the kerberized environment
in a few days.

> But I found at least an issue I would consider a blocker for
> this RC: see BIGTOP-446.

Let me mark it.

> 2/ zookeeper wasn't started. Once I manually started the service
> (without any issue), everything got unblocked. Probably worth opening a
> ticket.

Sounds good.

> 5/ I noticed quite a few crashes on the tasktracker/regionservers. Their
> stack traces are from being helpful. But this is an upstream issue (or
> me/puppet doing something stupid).
> 6/ Because of 5/, it would be nice to have some supervisor processes

+many. I filed this one some time ago, but still haven't had time to
work on it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-263

> 7/ It would also be very helpful to have some
> munin/collectd/ganglia/nagios integration

Agreed.

> 8/ It would be nice to be able to configure HBASE heap

You mean via puppet?

> Overall I really enjoyed it!
> The combination of puppet recipes and packages made it really easy to go
> from nothing to a 20 machine hadoop cluster.

Great to hear! I've been doing some experimenting with a couple
of node, but 20 is quite something.

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org