incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:15:30 GMT
On 26 March 2012 16:20, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe <shinichiro.abe.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello Incubator IPMC,
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0.
>>>> This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection.
>>>> You can find the artifact at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC0/,
or
>>>> in svn at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.5-incubating-RC0/.
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file says:
>>> Apache ManifoldCF
>>> Copyright 2010-2011 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>
>>> The LICENSE file includes references to lots of jars that are dual
>>> licensed under CDDL v1.0 and GPL v2.
>>> However, there is no indication which license has been chosen by the project.
>>>
>>> I think this is a blocker.
>
> A project does not choose a license.  The license is provided by the copyright
> owner.  We do not change that license, nor do we reduce the number of the
> available licenses to choose from, for downstream recipients.  Therefore,
> it doesn't make any sense to indicate which one is "chosen".
>
> In any case, the indicated artifacts are only included in binary packages.
> We don't release binaries, so none of these licenses belong in our source
> product's LICENSE file.  We need to be clear that the source code package
> does not include these dependencies.  They only exist in binary distributions.

That's not the case with this product at present; all the jars are
actually in SVN and they are also in the source and binary archives.

> If the project constructs binary distributions via a shared process, then
> the LICENSE/NOTICE files for those distribution packages need to be constructed
> as well --- either by appending a separate file (that contains just the
> licenses/notices that are added for the binary package) or by maintaining a
> separate LICENSE/NOTICE set for the binary package.
>
> ....Roy
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message