Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 074EE98F8 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78878 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 12:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78652 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 12:34:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78644 invoked by uid 99); 29 Feb 2012 12:34:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:34:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nour.mohammad@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:34:13 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so2286841obq.6 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nour.mohammad@gmail.com designates 10.182.136.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.136.41; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nour.mohammad@gmail.com designates 10.182.136.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nour.mohammad@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=nour.mohammad@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.136.41]) by 10.182.136.41 with SMTP id px9mr55828obb.21.1330518833069 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:33:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cK+ZQ5y/i4cCai/TaphcLLxFGFhUOsc7cSJkn3M0r3k=; b=k2EtwltB4ASS8h27/sbf7h80/x+aWuV1+u7Tm+aSh7oYofTobRitkwHjovX/PMJ14M OCi8kVtSSl4Em5MirG4yuhnlo3uJ0nvVN2AoeGZdyp5X7wZ2kFlo9xFVAztVAX7QMCMY 8OC8AqCmx4RvTm1qI3EuDR4Lb2EEqDGx1K5TY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.136.41 with SMTP id px9mr47640obb.21.1330518833009; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.19.200 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:33:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator) From: Mohammad Nour El-Din To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f646e7568953504ba198e2e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f646e7568953504ba198e2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes I did, and thanks for clarification :), and please read my as well :). Thanks. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Has nothing to do with incubation. You're talking about Foundation-wide > policy. You cannot impose different naming rules on podlings, than what is > imposed on TLPs. Please see my response in the original thread. You need a > Board resolution and rationale. > > -g > On Feb 29, 2012 5:03 AM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" > wrote: > > > I don't see that this getting to any clear end yet. So I suggest that we > > take this from a Sqoop instance to be a discussion on rules them selves. > > > > I would like to start a [VOTE] about whether it is a *must* for podlings > to > > rename all packages before being a TLP or not over keeping the old > package > > names for backward compatibility. What ever the consensus going to be > built > > we definitely need to update the Incubator documents to clear this kind > of > > issue. But before starting the vote I would like to consider others' > > opinions. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Patrick Hunt > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > > wrote: > > > > > On the other hand, I totally respect that Cloudera's interest to > > > support > > > > > their customers and provide backword compatibility, but this is > *not* > > > the > > > > > point at all, the point is this *should* not, and even allow me to > > say > > > > this > > > > > is *must* not be the problem of Apache, and yes I agree with the > > > opinion > > > > > that this is a matter to be decided by Sqoop team but not to make > > > > Apache's > > > > > problem. So also let not get more into this!!! > > > > > > > > Or course this is Apache's problem. You can't have your cake and eat > > > > it too. If you accept code for a project you accept the community as > > > > well. Say Apache accepts a project like Open Office, should we ignore > > > > the existing community and not concern ourselves with backward > > > > compatibility for that project as well, because the original code > > > > wasn't birthed at Apache? > > > > > > > > > > That's a very slippery slope. Maybe some projects get way too much > leeway > > > because of the big flashing lights. Regardless of how big the press > > > headlines are all projects should be held to the same standard. > > > > > > No project should be allowed to graduate without solving all issues > > > pertaining to marks. It's a failure of the incubator in the past for > > > allowing other projects to do so. I'm shocked it was allowed. > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > -- Alex > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > ---- > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep > moving" > > - Albert Einstein > > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein --e89a8f646e7568953504ba198e2e--