Return-Path: 
 <general-return-34189-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25A5F9A2A
	for <apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  6 Feb 2012 14:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 1044 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 14:57:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 577 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 14:57:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 562 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2012 14:57:22 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:57:22 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:57:16 +0000
Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so1868945eek.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.132.74 with SMTP id n50mr5782073eei.47.1328540214941;
        Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.10.100.148] (oosteinde.castasoftware.com. [81.21.138.121])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o49sm61867191eei.0.2012.02.06.06.56.53
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:56:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F2FEA34.4030509@douma.nu>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:56:52 +0100
From: Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
CC: wookie-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Licence headers in template files
References: 
 <CAKQbXgAx7z6ApLzA+Yxkdgvusx-xVH7c1nEtbFxx1Ui_ZpUKbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFYJNZVAeSaFAMwoNTrA57EpGGgF2znrY=p1zkF15kopgqpHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOFYJNZVAeSaFAMwoNTrA57EpGGgF2znrY=p1zkF15kopgqpHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/06/2012 03:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [legal-discuss@?]
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler
> <rgardler@opendirective.com>  wrote:
>> Would it be acceptable for these files to *not* have licence headers in them?
>
> Going further, you may want to explicitly declare that downstream
> users have the right to distribute their widgets under whatever terms
> they choose (without the conditions of section 4 of ALv2), regardless
> of whether they contain such template content from Wookie. A bit like
> the GPL exceptions mentioned in
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/exceptions.html.

Very good point Jukka.
AFAIK these templates are indeed intended to be used to kind of 'create' code, 
which output then preferably not require NOTICE obligations.

>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org