Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE8E49B9E for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 23:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68363 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 23:28:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67952 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 23:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67944 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2012 23:28:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:28:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [77.238.189.197] (HELO nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com) (77.238.189.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:28:05 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.233] by nm9.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2012 23:27:43 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.244] by tm14.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2012 23:27:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1009.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2012 23:27:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 912636.22358.bm@omp1009.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 3282 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2012 23:27:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1328398063; bh=EpsbffSl0M+yXivKGoMJQHKjVFY4I+v78OHom0cdmAk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OYShus4m6aZDWIWxHJSEG9gEXdI87r4jsmeuAnmy+xWh8LqXeuoSjD+QPnpqtkrSImhSbdzgkwf7E+dOdIb3dS4EfPT+DtRKQj5VRpBb0EtsIG/3LGLgP9ttCzDZHdLHQpiFJ8bD9SkA16+FbWGNKm5u/Aho7HbEgAzbSPFhpLQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=S+u5L/cr7foGgWvIRB0uLeJ+TTFdeSmUDA9B+Ha4NrcIyp4Cx/lWlGgmYd9dHbh7UZDN0Hd5eGGynRjmft9iGXN0Wsz/jp59Lmxc/UIoz3W1CG8R8pUefYmcMBvtlLBX00egaab10A3AB/+IV7QvBBiTeOFVqJV6fe+kc27RrkY=; X-YMail-OSG: CHW62MkVM1lLTiT1TArfHM1K0dQ046Ip1oIMst4ya0fh7pK IvJl4FqdEEGUwvM5.k0astBDTpXWRN8T9Il3uCrXyAGi3KsV77ZtIsODDKpf o4Fa5RiSP10MmLZ3.OxOTR5zdO9J_JTeazE8TdkQwdJV8aF9S.s5sAyiZx6T Fm3uptDvAgwTi9B5XDTF77L2YhS8wc9v4BT6MSIK1a5vyYJwwtwDFR0hbknv SuszVsNbWCRzjdwP_7jiQX85Ebn7aNoTYK1cGob6no.JgSzECRJFXYMJpU3K SWljRGOyfo9I8WcElM.lPUF3AXClIHlZ3tDt.PrI5wn6LNDHASNU896mpdyq LiK9x1dRnluE.v2tkhqxsxWoCn0RHxaH4PlJpfCcOqHr61KWIBVfJxgVUIkV PpjyBGlLSSVByf3iUFxwWb7_oznA3l..FbPKYQL0SLu8KE4HIqUXQFQ-- Received: from [80.108.122.184] by web171508.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:27:43 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537 References: <1328356532.96485.YahooMailNeo@web171518.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <20120204224817.GA543@igg.local> Message-ID: <1328398063.96861.YahooMailNeo@web171508.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 23:27:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Struberg Reply-To: Mark Struberg Subject: Re: Reviewing a Release To: "general@incubator.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <20120204224817.GA543@igg.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi! Thanks for the link > And http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list Seems like this is work in progress as well, as lots of the lines are boldly marked as TODO ... > That legal link is wrong, see the top of that doc. I don't think so! The link you posted is valid as well, but it doesn't cover the list of licenses we already checked. For this kind of stuff I really prefer this link: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html This sums up the important stuff really good, like the Category A, B and X stuff. It also explains the 'what' and 'why' much better than the official 'resolved' page it links to: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Of course, adding all 3 links would be the best I think. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: David Crossley > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2012 11:48 PM > Subject: Re: Reviewing a Release > > Mark Struberg wrote: >> Hi folks! >> >> I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your > vote for a staged release. >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release >> >> This was done from the back of my head, thus I've maybe missed some > parts. Just wondered if we don't have such a checklist somewhere for general > incubator projects? >> >> Feel free to add anything missing or point me to a location where this > already got collected. > > That legal link is wrong, see the top of that doc. > > Follow http://apache.org/dev/#licenses > to the third point: > http://apache.org/legal/#dev-links > then "Previously Asked Questions". > > And http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > > There is probably some other stuff at: > http://apache.org/dev/#releases > > That is also necessary for the background understanding. > > -David > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org