incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Franklin, Matthew B." <mfrank...@mitre.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
Date Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:22:15 GMT
For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is
preferred [1].  This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that
you should look at.

[1]: 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-typ
es

On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:

>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party
>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of
>>> your release.  Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and
>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses
>>>which I
>>> don't see in your LICENSE file.
>
>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt
>file contains the Apache license v2.0.
>
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt
>
>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it
>again?


Ant itself includes code under a separate license.  Since your binary
release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to
include its license.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE



>
>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files.
>
>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from
>>trunk to
>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement.
>
>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not
>tested enough yet.
>
>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut
><thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0
>>license. If
>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the
>> overnext year.
>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution?
>>
>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from
>>trunk to
>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement.
>>
>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@mitre.org>
>>
>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted
>>> below.
>>>
>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi,
>>> >
>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes
>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin.
>>> >
>>> >Signing KEYS:
>>> >
>>> 
>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/
>>>fi
>>> >les/KEYS
>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/
>>>
>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN?
>>>
>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at
>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public
>>> html folder, but this is not required.
>>>
>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/
>>> >NOTICE.txt:
>>> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt
>>> >LICENSE.txt:
>>> 
>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt
>>>
>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party
>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of
>>> your release.  Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and
>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses
>>>which I
>>> don't see in your LICENSE file.
>>>
>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/
>>> >
>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license
>>> >headers.
>>> >
>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16
>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2.
>>> >
>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote!
>>> >
>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks.
>>> >--
>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> >@eddieyoon
>>> >
>>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Jungblut
>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>@eddieyoon
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message