incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [WITHDRAW][VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:58 GMT
Ok, thanks.
So I withdraw this release candidate, address CLEREZZA-682 and will propose
RC6 asap.

Reto

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>wrote:

> 2012/2/3 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@apache.org>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <antelder@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding
> > +1
> > > in
> > > > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect
> NOTICE
> > > and
> > > > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> > > modules
> > > > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
> > fixes
> > > > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the
> assembly
> > > > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules
> > not
> > > in
> > > > the release profile.
> > > >
> > > > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> > > modules in
> > > > the release profile.
> > > >
> > > > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb
> > launcher
> > > > are available with their signatures at:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> > > >
> > > > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Reto
> > >
> > > I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> > > good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
> > >
> >
> > I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
> > assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to
> address
> > this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
> > releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
>
>
> > >
> > > The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> > > distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> > > from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> > > of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> > > licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> > > LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> > > text as it is though.
> > >
> > I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to
> remark
> > that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more
> explicit
> > than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> > > here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> > > the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> > > you'll get the necessary votes.
> > >
> >
> > While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
> > feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
> > individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso
> we
> > had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that
> you
> > would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been
> fixed.
> >
> > The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
> > missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
> > exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
> > source distro).
> >
> >
> I think the best option would be to fix the NOTICE in binary, fire a new RC
> and release the binary stuff too because releasing only the source
> package, in my opinion, would be not that convenient in terms of using
> Apache Clerezza as devs couldn't take the binary neither from ASF mirrors
> nor from Maven Central.
> WDYT?
>
> Tommaso
>
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> >
> > >
> > >  ...ant
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message