incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>
Subject Re: February report review
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:16 GMT
Thanks Jukka, a fair exaltation of the projects I'm involved with.

Single sign off should not be a concern. There are a couple of projects
where, for example, I have participated in report composition but have not
signed off. Only one mentor is required to sign off.

Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 8, 2012 5:43 PM, "Joe Schaefer" <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Nice job Jukka.  For me the biggest uptick from Jan was the mentor
> participation in the sign-offs, clearly people are taking more time
> reading these reports now.
>
>
> The single-signoff or non-signoff projects are an area of concern
> should a pattern emerge.  Perhaps we need to take a closer look at
> mentor activity in those projects and adjust if need be.
>
> Anybody know what the holdup is for Amber regarding IP Clearance?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
> > To: general <general@incubator.apache.org>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:37 PM
> > Subject: February report review
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
> >
> > I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
> > issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
> > NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
> > missed their previous report), asking them to report again next month
> > unless they already have something ready. HISE didn't report as the
> > project is just about to retire.
> >
> > Based on the submitted reports I'd divide the projects into the
> > following three rough categories:
> >
> > 1) Still getting started at the Incubator (7 podlings)
> >    - Any23
> >    - Bloodhound
> >    - Cordova
> >    - DeltaSpike
> >    - DeviceMap
> >    - Flex
> >    - Openmeetings
> >
> > 2) Not yet ready to graduate, categorized by most pressing issue (12
> podlings)
> >    2a) IP clearance: Amber
> >    2b) Release trouble: Clerezza, Stanbol
> >    2c) Low activity: Ambari, Nuvem, PhotArk, SIS, Wink
> >    2d) Low diversity: Airavata, Droids, VCL, Wookie
> >
> > 3) Ready to graduate (3 podlings)
> >    - Jena
> >    - Lucene.NET
> >    - OpenNLP
> >
> > Also, I looked at the number of mentors signing off a report. Most had
> > at least two explicit sign-offs, which is pretty good. Here's the list
> > of projects with less than that:
> >
> > - no signoffs: Amber, OpenNLP
> > - one signoff: Any23, Ambari, Jena, Lucene.NET, Nuvem, Openmeetings,
> > PhotArk, Wink
> >
> > I'm not yet sure how useful (or even meaningful) summaries like this
> > are. If people find this summary useful or more importantly something
> > we can act on, then we could try doing it again for future reports.
> >
> > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jukka Zitting
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message