incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Subject Re: February report review
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:30:15 GMT
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next
> month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues.

Hey, now don't go and start spreading false rumors here.  Particularly
as the archives are available for all to review.  :-)

Sam's suggestion was to do that IF THEY WERE STALLED.  In particular
what I said, and I quote, was: "If there are plans, and there is
evidence of recent progress towards resolving the issue, fine."

> I think
> that's perhaps a bit too aggressive (most of these issues take more
> than a month to solve) so I'd be happy to just raise awareness of the
> issue within the podlings and ask for a summary of actions and
> progress in their May report. I've included wording like that in the
> report summary on the wiki page. Feel free to edit if another approach
> would be better.

What I would like to see is the Incubator start identifying PPMCs that
are stalled, and to consider what information they need (in future
reports) to help them (us) make such a determination.  I am not
suggesting that this be made retroactive.  Or that it be done
immediately.  A plan would be fine: i.e., setting a date by which the
IPMC will have decided what information needs to be in such reports,
and a schedule by which the PPMCs need to start providing said
information.

> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012?action=diff&rev1=78&rev2=79
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting

- Sam Ruby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message