incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator
Date Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:39:15 GMT
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
> >> I agree that this potentially could be an issue, but whether it's a
> >> technical requirement is up to the team who's doing the work. If
> >> Apache feels that there is a requirement that no project releases
> >> code/document/etc... under any package other than org.apache.* then
> >> that should be clearly defined and communicated. At this point my
> >> understanding is there is no such requirement.
> >>
> >>
> > I think this is a policy we should adhere too from this point forward.
>
> Apache wide policy or incubator policy? If it's not Apache wide then
> any project could just wait till graduation and do as they see fit.
> The idea of incubation is to ensure that a podling adheres to Apache
> policy before being let loose to run itself. If we make this an
> incubator only restriction we're saying that that's not the case.
>
>
That's a good point.


> > The technical problem is small in comparison to other issues this brings
> into play.
>
> What issues? That people will be confused about whether Apache
> released/branded code, downloaded from Apache, where the majority of
> the code is org.apache packaged, but some subset of clearly marked
> deprecated code, defined as an aid for migration is Apache or not?
> Doesn't seem like an issue to me.
>
>
I think the issues were amply expressed in this thread. Just take a look at
what Ate, Mo, and I said earlier.

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message