incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)
Date Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:42:43 GMT
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Has nothing to do with incubation. You're talking about Foundation-wide
> > > policy. You cannot impose different naming rules on podlings, than what
> > is
> > > imposed on TLPs. Please see my response in the original thread. You
> need
> > a
> > > Board resolution and rationale.
> > >
> > >
> > I'm glad you phrased it like this. It totally takes us out of the scope
> of
> > the perceived problem. As you say you have to apply the same rules until
> > policies change, if they change. You're amazingly cogent dude! It's a
> > strong argument that I can't disagree with even though I am convinced the
> > perceived problem is quite serious.
> >
> > I'll withdraw my veto on the other VOTE thread but I really want to
> > evaluate this in this discussion thread.
> >
>
> I agree with this, I believe that Sqoop deserve to be graduated for a lot
> of reasons and even the discussion in hand it is not all their fault it is
> fault of Mentors and a problem of lacking of clear information about such
> situation, so IMO as I explained before we proceed with the vote and bring
> that issue in a more general ASF wide level.


Yep you did say that at first and you were right. It just takes a while for
me to absorb ;).

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message