incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: February report review
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:43:03 GMT
Let's reset expectations then so that every
mentor is expected to sign-off on reports.
That way we have a better way of surveying
whether or not a podling is getting it's
share of active participation from mentors.




>________________________________
> From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com>
>To: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>; general@incubator.apache.org 
>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:41 PM
>Subject: Re: February report review
> 
>
>Thanks Jukka, a fair exaltation of the projects I'm involved with.
>Single sign off should not be a concern. There are a couple of projects where, for example,
I have participated in report composition but have not signed off. Only one mentor is required
to sign off.
>
>
>Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
>On Feb 8, 2012 5:43 PM, "Joe Schaefer" <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Nice job Jukka.  For me the biggest uptick from Jan was the mentor
>>participation in the sign-offs, clearly people are taking more time
>>reading these reports now.
>>
>>
>>The single-signoff or non-signoff projects are an area of concern
>>should a pattern emerge.  Perhaps we need to take a closer look at
>>mentor activity in those projects and adjust if need be.
>>
>>Anybody know what the holdup is for Amber regarding IP Clearance?
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
>>> To: general <general@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:37 PM
>>> Subject: February report review
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
>>>
>>> I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
>>> issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
>>> NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
>>> missed their previous report), asking them to report again next month
>>> unless they already have something ready. HISE didn't report as the
>>> project is just about to retire.
>>>
>>> Based on the submitted reports I'd divide the projects into the
>>> following three rough categories:
>>>
>>> 1) Still getting started at the Incubator (7 podlings)
>>>    - Any23
>>>    - Bloodhound
>>>    - Cordova
>>>    - DeltaSpike
>>>    - DeviceMap
>>>    - Flex
>>>    - Openmeetings
>>>
>>> 2) Not yet ready to graduate, categorized by most pressing issue (12 podlings)
>>>    2a) IP clearance: Amber
>>>    2b) Release trouble: Clerezza, Stanbol
>>>    2c) Low activity: Ambari, Nuvem, PhotArk, SIS, Wink
>>>    2d) Low diversity: Airavata, Droids, VCL, Wookie
>>>
>>> 3) Ready to graduate (3 podlings)
>>>    - Jena
>>>    - Lucene.NET
>>>    - OpenNLP
>>>
>>> Also, I looked at the number of mentors signing off a report. Most had
>>> at least two explicit sign-offs, which is pretty good. Here's the list
>>> of projects with less than that:
>>>
>>> - no signoffs: Amber, OpenNLP
>>> - one signoff: Any23, Ambari, Jena, Lucene.NET, Nuvem, Openmeetings,
>>> PhotArk, Wink
>>>
>>> I'm not yet sure how useful (or even meaningful) summaries like this
>>> are. If people find this summary useful or more importantly something
>>> we can act on, then we could try doing it again for future reports.
>>>
>>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message