incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: February report review
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:42:49 GMT
Nice job Jukka.  For me the biggest uptick from Jan was the mentor
participation in the sign-offs, clearly people are taking more time
reading these reports now.


The single-signoff or non-signoff projects are an area of concern
should a pattern emerge.  Perhaps we need to take a closer look at
mentor activity in those projects and adjust if need be.

Anybody know what the holdup is for Amber regarding IP Clearance?


----- Original Message -----
> From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
> To: general <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:37 PM
> Subject: February report review
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
> 
> I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
> issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
> NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
> missed their previous report), asking them to report again next month
> unless they already have something ready. HISE didn't report as the
> project is just about to retire.
> 
> Based on the submitted reports I'd divide the projects into the
> following three rough categories:
> 
> 1) Still getting started at the Incubator (7 podlings)
>    - Any23
>    - Bloodhound
>    - Cordova
>    - DeltaSpike
>    - DeviceMap
>    - Flex
>    - Openmeetings
> 
> 2) Not yet ready to graduate, categorized by most pressing issue (12 podlings)
>    2a) IP clearance: Amber
>    2b) Release trouble: Clerezza, Stanbol
>    2c) Low activity: Ambari, Nuvem, PhotArk, SIS, Wink
>    2d) Low diversity: Airavata, Droids, VCL, Wookie
> 
> 3) Ready to graduate (3 podlings)
>    - Jena
>    - Lucene.NET
>    - OpenNLP
> 
> Also, I looked at the number of mentors signing off a report. Most had
> at least two explicit sign-offs, which is pretty good. Here's the list
> of projects with less than that:
> 
> - no signoffs: Amber, OpenNLP
> - one signoff: Any23, Ambari, Jena, Lucene.NET, Nuvem, Openmeetings,
> PhotArk, Wink
> 
> I'm not yet sure how useful (or even meaningful) summaries like this
> are. If people find this summary useful or more importantly something
> we can act on, then we could try doing it again for future reports.
> 
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
> 
> BR,
> 
> Jukka Zitting
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message