Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51FDCB0B2 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32405 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 00:37:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31953 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 00:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31943 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2012 00:37:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:37:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:37:38 +0000 Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so5858612iak.6 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:37:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mlIxP8Qqf/5aGhOg3FT2KZhZxxwf6qaZTcl7S4cf7RQ=; b=TENcb3Z9T+9ZwlX9f0k2Hhn/kZ7hUb8hY1z8WIbYEBl0I5hoNXWgVjE2lH3bOyBi1k kAa9dttSRUpTkIMbaVSpxsKy9KUJQnkcWrFRn2jbjZwXOfZEb+/aZJuDpO0kzxtQcva6 B/VlOfduboHZf2CmnkN1KYpddOVtTv2z6Um2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.29.6 with SMTP id p6mr13401929icc.44.1326069437485; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:37:17 -0800 (PST) Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.43.133.196 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:37:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1326058969.52445.YahooMailNeo@web27805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:37:17 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jylUUrw6v-9KuV3GX0CufCACJk4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings From: Sam Ruby To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Sam, > > Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of messages > about squashing stale podlings, how about this adjustment to my > presentation: > > 1. OK, let's forget about dumping aged podlings We have quite a number of "aged podlings" with no activity and AWOL mentors. I don't want to forget about that. I continue to want to focus on that. Not on tossing, or allowing to continue indefinitely, or graduating prematurely. Instead I want to verify that the people who signed on as mentors, presumably in good faith at that time, are still on board. > 2. The third option I presented was 'graduate with an asterix'. > However, I didn't really intend to claim that no other possibilities > existed. Another possibility is 'remain under the supervision of the > incubator PMC but with more autonomy.' I could elaborate, but I'd > rather see if there is a remote consensus to go in any direction like > this. You want to see if people will agree to sign a blank check? My suggestion is that you present a more concrete proposal than "more autonomy" if you want people to agree to it. If the net result is that "aged podlings" can live comfortably in the incubator indefinitely, then this is not a proposal that I can support. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org