Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5093B2B1 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72436 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 17:10:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72164 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 17:10:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72156 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 17:10:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:10:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:10:45 +0000 Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so3918059wib.6 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:10:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=20ErJoOnL1unVRAUe+U0jjB5xaYNc/nHjFLaNljw7EU=; b=X/XVZPGadH0i/siNW4YmxI/iq6WzxFF0hpsaLfmeN93eu0cxkZ6sCfoLi+/aKFdaoY EczyMcOmNcHQl07z1NZkNVr3Zf+w9Ky3ZgXIDWvmkpmQKqmdWQFZ0iyyIxHXCsjsRaZ9 lw7nMAHUrovm/mPC5dEl7AM23w+zvW3mYKXZU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.13.17 with SMTP id eu17mr36481553wid.12.1326215424802; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.133 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:10:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <10AD3D3E-B041-4144-90D5-A1E563A5087B@gbiv.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:10:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Q. Forks without concensus?; A. anytime / depends / never without agreement From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:20, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> ...Ignore the proposal. It is out of date, since the podling has already >>> started. The Bloodhound and Trac communities already have a new non-fork >>> plan and are executing on that now, on the bloodhound-dev mailing list.... >> >> For completeness, could you mention that in the proposal, and link to >> the relevant threads? > > I agree. The proposal sits out there where people are prone to read it. Done: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BloodhoundProposal Cheers, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org