Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E36EB669 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63320 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 05:12:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62386 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 05:11:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62345 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 05:11:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:11:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:11:39 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so4835355wgb.0 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XCXMQbCsBEFGSt3tsRGn3rsBqUSp7kOxBDORnc0D6cs=; b=S4QB5DSYhtS+l1FYITIbdsAKrWoQvyu5qYP7QT58oIDIf4ghNhETsbTiuJpzr0ZWxG m9IGugnQnw+qwqX00lbbjfwwJR8S1uM4K7RQSJ0xF/ecEs8dAqcLFBDtv1dxmIwYyapw Qqvp8z4OBO9Pk2VBdn3zJqxuq5XDgIiUHJFZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.13.208 with SMTP id fa16mr9563059wid.12.1326172279594; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.133 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:11:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.133 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:11:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <10AD3D3E-B041-4144-90D5-A1E563A5087B@gbiv.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:11:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Q. Forks without concensus?; A. anytime / depends / never without agreement From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7de4a2dd6104b6258bd4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c7de4a2dd6104b6258bd4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Jan 9, 2012 10:03 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote: >... > And, no, the discussion has not been with the Trac community -- it was > in private with a few individuals; as far as Apache is concerned, > it never happened. And Oracle's private conversations, and their decisions regarding OOo contrary to the community, were somehow acceptable? ... There is no fork in the current plan, so this discussion is moot anyways. -g --f46d043c7de4a2dd6104b6258bd4--