Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23F469F74 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60260 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 07:40:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59424 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 07:40:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59414 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2012 07:40:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:40:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:40:24 +0000 Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so26595107iak.6 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.160.194 with SMTP id xm2mr61349340igb.18.1325576402959; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:40:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (99-180-69-21.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [99.180.69.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id py4sm109646063igc.2.2012.01.02.23.40.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:40:02 -0800 (PST) From: Ralph Goers Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--623150794 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bloodhound to join the Incubator Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:40:00 -0800 In-Reply-To: <7644B7B5-6525-4CE1-9C96-3E0EE24DD791@dslextreme.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org References: <178D0CB6-D949-486F-99DA-D10363DF0767@dslextreme.com> <96BC3F76-A04A-4382-9CC1-547CA6757F9C@dslextreme.com> <7644B7B5-6525-4CE1-9C96-3E0EE24DD791@dslextreme.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-2--623150794 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii FWIW, this link was used by Sam during the discussion I referred to = below - http://s.apache.org/QeN Ralph On Jan 2, 2012, at 11:29 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >=20 > On Jan 2, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >=20 >> On Jan 2, 2012 10:51 PM, "Ralph Goers" = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Greg, I do not care one bit how much commit activity happens at = Trac. As >> long as there is some kind of active community it is improper to fork = it >> without their permission. >>=20 >> Eh? You ever read the "rules for revolutionaries" page? The basic = concept >> is: don't try to force two communities into one; when separate = visions for >> the project occur, then separate them. >>=20 >> I don't see it as our place to *judge* communities. If it is a fork, = or a >> corporate spin-out, or a move, or brand new... All Good. We provide a >> temporary home in the Incubator to see if it can become a good, = proper, and >> healthy Apache community. We don't turn them away a-priori based on = their >> history. >=20 > Greg, this seems to be so much B.S as it apparently serves some = particular interest you have. A PMC I am on had this exact conversation = with board members several months ago regarding a code base the project = is dependent on that is housed outside the ASF which we were considering = bringing in as a subproject. We were told that under no circumstances = could we fork the code without the "owner's" blessing, regardless of = what the license allowed us to do. To me, this answer is black and = white.=20 >>=20 >> In my mind, the Trac core has slowed, and it needs revitalization and = a new >> vision. Others may disagree, and do, and that's fine. But I don't = think it >> is fine for us to make judgements of communities (or nascent ones!) = who >> want to try something new. To pick up and go in a direction that = others are >> not heading, or do not have the time to make. >=20 > I have no idea what you are saying. You ARE making a judgement on a = community by saying it isn't active enough and deserves to be forked. = Again, some of your fellow board members have said the ASF isn't the = place for that. >=20 > Ralph >=20 --Apple-Mail-2--623150794--