Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 400AA9D96 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30623 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 17:36:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30488 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 17:36:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30480 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2012 17:36:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:36:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.38] (HELO smtpauth21.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:35:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 10649 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2012 17:35:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth21.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.38) with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2012 17:35:38 -0000 Message-ID: <4F033C66.5050607@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:35:34 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org CC: Greg Stein Subject: Q. Forks without concensus?; A. anytime / depends / never without agreement References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/3/2012 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Jan 3, 2012 11:48 AM, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote: >> ... >>>> A PMC I am on had this exact conversation with board members several >>>> months ago regarding a code base the project is dependent on that is housed >>>> outside the ASF which we were considering bringing in as a subproject. We >>>> were told that under no circumstances could we fork the code without the >>>> "owner's" blessing, regardless of what the license allowed us to do. To me, >>>> this answer is black and white. >>> >>> Not to me. :-) >> >> Which is the problem, isn't it? Note; hat switch, you are now speaking >> with the authority of a Director. > > Euh, nope. Offering my personal opinions. A Director hat would (and does) > mean nothing since I could not speak for the Board. So this is a question that should be put to bed once and for all, you have both been swinging pretty wildly at diametrically opposed answers to this question. If we read that the Board has charged this committee with acceptance criteria for submitted or proposed products... then the question above should be resolved. Essentially, we have several choices... [ ] Forks are accepted without judgement [Greg] [1] [ ] [something more nuanced here] [ ] Hostile forks are never acceptable [Roy] [2] If the answer lies somewhere in the middle, it would help potential contributors/forkers to know approximately where that middle sits. [1] "I don't see it as our place to *judge* communities. If it is a fork, or a corporate spin-out, or a move, or brand new... All Good. " [2] "At Apache, all contributions are voluntary. We do not accept code from copyright owners who don't want us to have it, even if we have the legal right to adopt it for other reasons. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org