From general-return-33215-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Jan 4 23:52:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B853BB375 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35707 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 23:52:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35264 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 23:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35256 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 23:52:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:52:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:52:19 +0000 Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so10585027wib.6 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:51:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KRtaeO0wwuRd6SVCBNhDOuhBGDcw7qtwpRV41Vdqv88=; b=rJMVUxWMVgiXnf+iU/22LOlWXhmWHKUkNREZq4N1jCb0+Z13IA8rZJcr9jtGOH5kDe t8fb/sk4wNZbRXA82QimXaQsJU4G/H5gb7k2+LU4nQ6THYO9qMtW57OMKWHOroaVC29J 4cOLi5uSudMQVf4vlZjw4dH6J36OptpqmhUW8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.91.201 with SMTP id cg9mr127251164wib.15.1325721119475; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.133 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.133 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:51:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120104193304.GA3186@lp-shahaf.local> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:51:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Oversight of non-mailinglist-ful podlings From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdf1465c81f04b5bc80af X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043bdf1465c81f04b5bc80af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Jan 4, 2012 4:01 PM, "sebb" wrote: > > On 4 January 2012 19:45, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 14:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> Someone created > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/site/trunk/?p=1227271 > >> before the devicemap-commits@ list was created. I expect no list > >> received a commit mail about it. > >> > >> This PMC may want to review its mailer config and/or podling creation > >> policies to ensure that no changes slip unnoticed. Saying "once the > >> commits mail flow, check the svn tree to see what it contained prior to > >> the first commit that was emailed about" might suffice. > > > > Couldn't we just have a default rule for asf/incubator/ go to > > private@incubator? Once a podling is constructed and configured, then > > its commit emails would go to the correct place. > > Seems like a good idea, but why use private@ - commit mails are not > normally private are they? > > Would it not be better to send them to public-commits@incubator.apache.orgor > general@incubator? I worry that something not configured to go somewhere specific, might be private. Since this kind of misconfig should be rare, it shouldn't flood private@. It also puts them in front of the PMC itself, many who I hypothesize are *not* subscribed to general@ or public-commits@ (I never even heard of the latter!) Cheers, -g --f46d043bdf1465c81f04b5bc80af--