incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Park Kato
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:15:44 GMT
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Ross Gardler
<> wrote:
> -1
> The IPMC is currently discussing how to handle these situations.

The IPMC has descended quickly in a long series of threads heavy on
personal abuse and light on constructive proposals. You call this
'discussion'. I call it a waste of time.


> Secondly, and more importantly I'd rather hear from the project
> community than a mentor who says (and I paraphrase) "as a mentor I
> think everything is OK but lets kill it anyway, I want to make a point
> to the IPMC". I appreciate my paraphrase my be doing a disservice to
> you Robert, but that is what it reads like to someone with only the
> information you provide here.

IMO demanding a more active response from Mentors then asking for a
recount from the community smells of hypocritical

The IPMC strongly and clearly expressed the opinion that the Kato
Mentors needs to be more active or face termination. This is the
solution I favour personally.

Either back the original judgment of Kato's Mentors and trust the
community to come up with solutions, remove those holding this
minority view from the IPMC, or sign up as a new Mentor for Kato


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message