incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
Date Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:41:30 GMT
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
>> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
>> expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we
>> said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so
>>
>> +1
>
>
> Thanks for the review and vote ant, much appreciated.
>
>
>>
>> but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE
>> file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be
>> there.
>
> I'm curious what in your opinion doesn't need to be in the NOTICE file.
> I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK
> all those notices are required.
> Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently?
>

See this email [1] for an answer to a similar question, also there is
now a definition of required third party notices at [2].

In a nutshell, very few things actually require mention in the NOTICE
file, and best not to unless there is a reason to.

   ...ant

[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201111.mbox/%3CCAJO%2BUbvDfOib7FnQpJPtVcMJKDvBPRHpAG4%3DbEO3Vmy4w4reFA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message