incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:12:53 GMT
+1

I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
otherwise). People have said in the past, "you should have veto so you're
not forced to work with somebody you dislike." I respond, "grow up. we work
with annoying people all the time, and the majority says they *can* work
with this person."
On Jan 30, 2012 7:07 PM, "Joe Schaefer" <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:

> It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
> lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
> authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
> PMC.  Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
> votes are by straight majority consensus, iow no vetoes allowed.
>
> I intend to offer a policy vote on this issue over the coming
> days and that vote, as with all procedural votes, is NOT subject
> to veto.
>
> Any other rational opinions?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message