Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D59D175D0 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30710 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2011 17:15:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30515 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2011 17:15:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30507 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2011 17:15:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:15:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:15:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 8672 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2011 17:14:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Dec 2011 17:14:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap, a data repository and APIs for mobile device information From: Andrus Adamchik In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:14:53 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <0BA9EDB1-381C-4A01-8C52-8C1449497443@objectstyle.org> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The question is essentially about any existing assets the project is = planning to bring to Apache. While any answer to that is unlikely to = disqualify the proposal, it may lead to licensing questions, process = questions, etc. So while this is curiosity of sorts, I think it is an = important thing to understand. Andrus On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Andrus Adamchik = wrote: >>=20 >> On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>=20 >>> Note that the proposal mentions OpenDDR donating their *source code* >>> only - as mentioned in the proposal, the "details" of the repository >>> data will be discussed once the podling starts. >>=20 >> The repository is the most valuable piece here. So I think it is = important to discuss this aspect here now. Appreciate the proposal = authors commenting on it.... >=20 > I agree that the format and contents of the DeviceMap data repository > require serious discussions: which sources of data to use, which > format(s) to use to store and to publish the data, how to trace data > provenance where needed, etc. >=20 > However, all this is IMO out of scope of the "do we agree for > DeviceMap podling to enter incubation" discussion that we're having > now. So, if you're asking out of curiosity I'm fine, but if you think > the acceptance of the podling should be based on this discussion > about the data repository "details", I disagree. >=20 > -Bertrand >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org