Return-Path: 
 <general-return-32106-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0BD376E7
	for <apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  9 Nov 2011 22:49:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 76305 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2011 22:49:36 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76038 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2011 22:49:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75202 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2011 22:49:35 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:49:35 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of leoneumeyer@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.182 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.216.182] (HELO mail-qy0-f182.google.com)
 (209.85.216.182)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:49:30 +0000
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so2553843qyk.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:49:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=BSRItjkpG5Goq5W619wLquWGPVNEmMWP+nWjpR++caY=;
        b=iQy+lul8Bue/LvJ2DI3DYd8qhmA9Zu+q3ZZuFfGDr0adCpLBbAjbxpyxOopKyryNIO
         VXRyLTAn2OnoNmkHGkdRfP7hYpZfMjxO0Wc2TmX/HPnlMR+P3m9ttsiqjEuucO6nqj9q
         2mtDnq4SNhVLxsZ1WvNJykkyZqLaH+AOX+tGw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.45.102 with SMTP id l6mr1337785obm.0.1320878949968; Wed,
 09 Nov 2011 14:49:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.182.3 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:49:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPFNckjtaeWcE0WD9bV3zXczbE+HHVTbUnmbPZ8Gut2wLpzAnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMcr8n_EMsQ6sRfQbN+LDksG-6MuZvBM5e1S0NTRT83hLZNQag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ_m3YDKLoU4O_Fi833_cuOCqQ7cdZ8Koi0WFU7rMK_di0d+aQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVmKVCvR6C9GXHw=-7kFpD+1zr66gRxq9xDhQ2rh3crrfMXyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADxLMzOp=BsEhd2n5UUT084szRJStNwPm-iYgUQwVuRcr=W7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMcr8n-YCcF1VV8CmACYTvVmQFZqKBo=+PLO4UVpRSLTz5TcWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFNckhRRxKpP9_q8rdS9nKkYs81XmpSn0h1AL6XsUZCzm44zw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVmKVDT=sPxO3JOjmPr7sBcOTsDewmv3qTbX7GAV_PbVC2=Hw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFNckjtaeWcE0WD9bV3zXczbE+HHVTbUnmbPZ8Gut2wLpzAnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:49:09 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAMcr8n9ShBT+G6X2RfP1=iH_WRk_usKJedOP46=An6_yemMKtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Git to SVN
From: Leo Neumeyer <leoneumeyer@gmail.com>
To: Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com>
Cc: jeremy@thomersonfamily.com, general@incubator.apache.org,
	Bruce Robbins <bruce.robbins.s4@gmail.com>, s4-dev@incubator.apache.org,
	Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>, infrastructure@apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444ef0b9aab1c04b155185f

--f46d0444ef0b9aab1c04b155185f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm curious if you also discussed using a hosted service like GitHub for
the projects. Seems to me that it would save us so much in resources and
time to take advantage of their free accounts for open source projects and
they seem to be doing a pretty good job. Perhaps there are concerns about
relying on a third party but for an organization powered by volunteers,
using a free service like this could be a great benefit. Perhaps there are
good reasons why this cannot be done but was wondering if it was discussed
at all.

-leo

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <jeremy@thomersonfamily.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
> >> loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not easily
> >> possible to convert.
> >
> > Why are we doing this on any project when we potentially have a git
> solution
> > around the corner?  Why not add these projects to the git experiment and
> > then only take this drastic action if the git experiment fails?
>
> This discussion was already held before a while. There are many
> questions to solve before.
>
> Cheers,
> Christian
> >
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
>



-- 

Leo Neumeyer (@leoneu)

--f46d0444ef0b9aab1c04b155185f--