Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93EA17EF2 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6530 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2011 00:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6293 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2011 00:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6285 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2011 00:49:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:49:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paul@querna.org designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:49:24 +0000 Received: by ghrr13 with SMTP id r13so73541ghr.6 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.147.4 with SMTP id tg4mr14132972obb.60.1322614143223; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.49.131 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:49:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Voting time period can be shortened ? (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating) From: Paul Querna To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > Hi, > > The context for this is the discussion here - > http://markmail.org/message/rsxjgrrufc6khlqy?q=overhead+list:org.apache.incubator.general > > This was a long discussion with no clear answers. > > We would like to know if it is OK to either - > > 1. shorten the release VOTE for change to one non-code file > 2. run 72 hour vote in parallel on the dev list as well as on general@ > > What we would like to know is if any member would "-1" the vote if we > choose to do either of the above ? You can most definitely run the votes in parallel. I did this for almost all of the Libcloud releases while it was in incubator. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org