Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFEFD75BE for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52564 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2011 16:13:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52240 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2011 16:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52226 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2011 16:13:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:13:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of karlpauls@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:13:48 +0000 Received: by faat2 with SMTP id t2so3203897faa.6 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:13:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yDbS3zIKWCWAY9JWAnE3WDNxhnQIy5Dd6MQbBmo0EJQ=; b=svSqF9cR2AzHji1SG3pbSzZsF8haa5NcsUtd3VDvnPWxiil1IMi7H8jKIvIRZ7gzn+ DRR1etiChmh/ow2PZK3a3mU90AUL5XYARurLy1jIoWL75HJNsY7EVK/ew+QHPAwNUb03 QiXaeVva3y+Ss3dG2atZTY26aPotDtz0c9xX8= Received: by 10.182.45.102 with SMTP id l6mr11808176obm.0.1321546407101; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:13:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.14.200 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:13:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7267349D-18FB-45A0-83A4-23A9298CD450@luminis.nl> From: Karl Pauls Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:13:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate ACE from the Apache Incubator To: general@incubator.apache.org, antelder@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote= : >>>> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release >>>> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is >>>> configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still >>>> confused what all of this has to do with the graduation proposal vote >>>> and why this has to be on general@. >>>> >>> >>> I think why its come up here now is because part of judging if a >>> poddling is ready to graduate is if they understand how to make and >>> review ASF releases properly. And with whats be said here and how the >>> source has to be built i'm wondering if anyone who voted +1 for the >>> release would have actually tried to build any of the source. >> >> I guess the point is: are you arguing that the release should not >> haven been accepted by the incubator in the first place on the grounds >> that you find it hard to build and hence, you want to see a new one >> before the we can vote on approaching the incubator for a graduation? >> > > I'm not arguing anything yet. Some valid comments and questions were > made in the vote thread, you asked why they were happening here and i > tried to answer that. The Incubator people should have an opportunity > to discuss a graduation, perhaps some of that might be better on a > graduation discussion thread but there wasn't one of those before the > vote. > > The release does look a bit dubious to me. Well, I understand that part and I agree that this is worthwhile to discuss. I'm just trying to get this sorted-out into something that we can discuss on the incubator level i.e., based on incubator requirements. In that sense, what are dubious points with the release that we as incubator pmc overlooked when voting on it? regards, Karl p.s.: Regarding the vote, let me make clear (in case it got missed): marcel did cc general@ on the community vote on whether we want to ask for graduation.This is not yet the actual incubator vote. Obviously, we better catch problems now so I think its good we have this discussion. > =A0 ...ant > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --=20 Karl Pauls karlpauls@gmail.com http://twitter.com/karlpauls http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org