From general-return-32073-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Nov 7 23:20:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BA507AA3 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79615 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2011 23:20:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79370 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2011 23:20:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79362 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2011 23:20:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:20:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:19:58 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so4497151vwe.6 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:19:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=soCqzUWZfV1cFYoi0iPqXFFdM0fVUADb/MCYat1O37o=; b=p0SG8AQhJ6zrTigr/eOft/M4uYGj0nVTRCgNKpcire2xeUuQ/V/YI/OwVvwnkMQLPC x+9n6fypbi7j4KcJ3w8uc0/HGg7Vg2FLuyyDDrMPqmDSmfXOoM8Mmfd0FoSsE50rIVf6 2+kGzDHD37qPXjrJs/Hwq4ulSJB9as8k/o/g4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.186.230 with SMTP id fn6mr28617204vdc.76.1320707977388; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.151.136 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:19:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EB82045.4000400@gmail.com> References: <4EB7A52F.8000802@gmail.com> <4EB7EFB8.8030506@gmail.com> <4EB82045.4000400@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:19:37 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4 From: sebb To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7 November 2011 18:15, J=F6rn Kottmann wrote: > >>>> Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please. >>>> >>>> The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph: >>>> >>>> "This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at >>>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed >>>> under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)." >>>> >>>> This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only; >>>> UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph. >>>> >>> Our mentors told us that all references should be mentioned in the NOTI= CE >>> file, OpenNLP does not even redistribute UIMA. So even if it would be a= n >>> external library there would be no need to include it in the NOTICE fil= e. >> >> Exactly. The NOTICE file is for included items only. >> >>> Is the new common way of doing things now the one suggested above? >> >> AIUI it was always - and still is - the case that the NOTICE file is >> for required notices only. >> >> If there is a document that says otherwise, please provide details here. > > No, I don't know of a document which says otherwise. I personally also > prefer > just to include the things which are necessary. We will update to NOTICE > file. > > Based on the other feedback we got from you I believe we should make one > more release candidate. Or do you think that is not necessary? I think it would be useful to redo the RC. Thanks. >> >> Not quite sure why there are tar.gz and zip versions of the binary >> archive, but only a zip version of the source archive. >> I would expect there to be a tar.gz source archive as well. > > Well, I guess others also, lets add it. >> >> The source archive contains some files that are not in SVN: >> pom.xml.releaseBackup (several, in different directories) >> opennlp/release.properties >> >> Looks like there was some kind of packaging problem. > > Yes I noticed issue directly after doing the RC 4, but thought > it might not be important enough to redo the RC since we had > the same issue with our last release and no one ever noticed it, > and it is not causing any issues. > > Anyway it is fixed already and will not happen again. > >> [SVN still contains a .cvsignore file under >> opennlp-uima\src\main\java\opennlp\uima\namefind; this can probably be >> removed] > > Good catch, we will remove it. > > J=F6rn > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org