From general-return-32552-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Nov 25 20:12:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACA4878CF for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95541 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2011 20:12:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95349 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2011 20:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95341 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2011 20:12:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:12:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:12:01 +0000 Received: by ywb20 with SMTP id 20so3648755ywb.6 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:11:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PcJ2UCihVRFzROza1sqF2KwkYQ1bFsnJLUJnFvvJf28=; b=uQU34PMtwPOWn16/dnE2346msdr24kZqfAqflCS3UvfRCyKlBD/dPoxjanvOvKu4oa WOjx41fnZpkrAr5s204j5Ou9FiQz9B0nS1qTurivSjHW9e1eReX4LcCZ9epYQdx9l072 l4ILtrBfZGhGF1Zqk6YfsJYgCdoX4EwYVI8+E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.145.72 with SMTP id o48mr49572783yhj.86.1322251900617; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:11:40 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: antelder@apache.org Sender: ant.elder@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.42.197 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:11:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1361CB42-8B7F-43D0-B002-0517B9722BC7@toolazydogs.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:11:40 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lw-2dYVZP_LKq_77IERst9TxVPk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating From: ant elder To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wro= te: > > On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera = wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: >>> >>>> Alan, >>>> >>>>>> It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list;= it >>>> was my understanding that votes take 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Because the only change was in the NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files from >>>> previous RC, our champion (Chris C) suggested we could run a quicker l= azy >>>> 24 hour vote. >>> >>> Yeah, I'm not sure the vote can be shortened. =A0I could be wrong. =A0I= f it can then I totally agree with the inclination to get goin' with this r= elease. =A0I'm sorry it's had so many first and starts. >>> >>>>>> Anyway, I've found some problems in the NOTICE file in that Kafka >>>> uses/ship NUnit but it's not in the NOTICE file. >>>> >>>> Quoting sebb and Kafka's champion (Chris C) discussed this in the last= vote >>>> - >>>> >>>>>>> 4) Your NOTICE file includes lot's of "This product includes X, >>>> developed by X.org" Your notice file should only include notices that = you >>>> are *required* to have. Don't include acknowledgements in your notice = file >>>> just for completeness. >>>> >>>>>>> Just to be clear: why not? >>>> >>>> *>>> The NOTICE file should be as short as possible, but no shorter. >>>> * >>>> Having said that, we also don't have any jar like "NUnit" in the relea= se >>>> artifacts. >>> >>> =A0B =A0 =A0 ./bin/../clients/csharp/lib/nunit/2.5.9/nunit.framework.dl= l >>> >>> Reading the license >>> >>> http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=3Dlicense&r=3D2.5.9 >>> >>> it seems to me that an acknowledgment =A0in the product documentation i= s required. =A0Am I misreading their license? =A0(wouldn't be the first tim= e) >>> >> >> I don't remember that license coming up before so the easiest way to >> find out is to bring it up at legal-discuss@. A similar question was >> raised in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-59 and the >> conclusion there was it didn't have to be in the NOTICE. This is not >> exactly the same but it is similar so maybe it would be ok for this >> release could go ahead assuming its ok and raise a legal JIRA to >> confirm that for the future? > > The tgz files are the product that's being distributed. =A0It's clear tha= t the NUnit license requires an acknowledgement somewhere in the product. > Earlier you said nunit was missing from the NOTICE so thats what I was replying about, but I think what you meant was that it was missing from the LICENSE too right? This does appear to ship the nunit dll and not mention that in the LICENSE file and that does seem like something that needs to be fixed. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org