incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE RESULT] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:57:32 GMT

Thanks Ant - our dev list agrees that we should be adding some information about what is being
updated - we will include this in future releases.

 

 

With that, we have 3 votes we need, we appreciate your guy's time in revewing our release.

 

 

~Prescott

----------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:12:29 +0000
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
> From: ant.elder@gmail.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Looks ok to me. In future releases it might be good to consider
> including a release notes type file that mentions whats been updated
> in the release
>
> +1
>
> ...ant
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We could use another vote or two,
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -P
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Benson Margulies
> > Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
> >
> > Well, fine, I am happy to +1.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
> >>>> based on recent traffic here.
> >>>
> >>> LOL
> >>>
> >>>> Unfortunately, that conversation left me
> >>>> with a giant headache and no clear idea.
> >>>>
> >>>> The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not
> >>>> a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required might be a
> >>> blocking problem but including just a little more than is necessary
> >>> isn't IMHO. If it was a podling release with so much unnecessary stuff
> >>> that it showed they didn't really understand the requirements maybe
> >>> thats worth voting against so they go and sort it out but for
> >>> something like this i think its ok to say sort it out later
> >>
> >> I am of the same opinion here. I think that some votes on this list are overly
critical, often laden with personal opinions and not real Foundation requirements. This leads
to a very frustrating experience to new podling members who are unable to tell the difference.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 		 	   		  
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message