incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Date Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:28:46 GMT
Thanks Craig - nice to not have to delete the code :)

I've updated the site.

Hen

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Craig L Russell
<craig.russell@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1 to retire Olio.
>
> The code grant for olio was signed and recorded
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/sun-microsystems-olio.pdf
> ) but the checkbox wasn't checked in the podling status.
>
> Making it read only would be the proper course of action.
>
> Craig
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Coming back to this.....
>>
>> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
>> that Olio will graduate.
>>
>> So, voting:
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] -1, no because...
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>>> <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement
>>>>>> vote).
>>>>>
>>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first
>>>>> place.
>>>>
>>>> Digging a bit:
>>>>
>>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>>
>>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>>
>>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>>
>>> Agreed.  Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message