incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [SITE] Champion documentation
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:52:14 GMT
On 24 November 2011 11:34, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:00 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 23 November 2011 22:39, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Also, it would make sense to publish the name of the champion in the
>>>> listing of podlings:
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
>>>> Not sure it needs to be a separate column.
>>>
>>> We could make it <strong>?
>>
>> If necessary, but I don't see the need.
>
> Strong names, Champion, not strong names mentors. We would save a column

As does re-using the Sponsor column which is what I propose.

The reason I did not want to use the mentor column is the Champion is
not necessarily a mentor.

>>> A separate column would make it less readable imho
>>
>> It would make the page wider.
>
> Yes... thats would I think is not so good. I am one of these guys who
> never have their browser at fullsize
>
>>>> Perhaps appropriate the "Apache Sponsor" column for the new role, i.e.
>>>> the title would become "Sponsor/Champion" and the contents would
>>>> contain
>>>>
>>>> sponsor TLP
>>>> name of champion
>>>
>>> Hm probably like this?
>>> Shindig (Surename Lastname)
>>
>> I don't like that, because the Champion is not necessarily directly
>> associated with the Sponsor.
>
> Currently it reads:
> "Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation (i.e. is an
> Officer only), the Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the
> Sponsor."
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
>
> Actually I think every Champion should be a member of the Sponsor. In
> case of "Incubator"-Sponsor, did we ever had the situation that a
> Member championed but was not on the IPMC? If this is not the case I
> would prefer to rephrase this to:
>
> "The Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the Sponsor."
>
> Thoughts?

That proposal belongs in a separate thread.

>> Having the champions name on a separate line makes them look more independent.
>
> Thats correct, but I think they are not really independent.
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Both options work for me, the second one I like a little bit better
>>> than the first
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>>> Seems to me that the Champion role is closer to Sponsor than it is to Mentor.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message