incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: concerns about high overhead in Apache incubator releases
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:49:03 GMT
On 29 November 2011 16:26, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This specifically says that a majority is NOT required.
>> This does seem odd.
>
> This does mean that a release (for example due to a security issue)
> cannot be held back by any entity or block of committers.

OK, that makes sense - but why is in not documented?

It would make the rules much easier to understand if such requirements
were explicitly documented.

AFAICT, the underlying requirements for most of the ASF rules are
rarely made explicit.
This makes them harder to understand, especially in edge cases.
It also makes them harder to amend (even just a clarification),
because in general it's not possible to verify if the proposed update
still meets the requirements.

> Martijn
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message