incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Clarify the role of the Champion as an "incubation coordinator" (was: should podlings have informal chairs?)
Date Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:41:09 GMT
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> > <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> >> <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> 3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
> >>
> >> Not sure if that actually makes sense. I think a Champion is a mentor
> >> by default somehow...
> >
> > Not if a podling PPMC member is elected as a Champion as the podling
progresses.
>
> Hm... it feels wrong somehow. If a pre-incubation Champion must be a
> $x-Member to enable a new podling, then the incubation Champion should
> be an $x-Member too.

Its someone willing to be answerable to the IPMC, why do they need to be a
member?

> I can already hear the questions: "Can I serve as
> a Champion, I am not a committer, but would like to bring this project
> to the asf".

The proposal is not to change the role of pre-incubation champion. As for
in-incubation, its a position of merit, so Joe someone, the non-committer
is not eligible.

Ross
On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message