From general-return-31727-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Oct 10 01:03:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A3E98E7 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5289 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 01:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5155 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 01:03:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5147 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2011 01:03:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:03:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.27] (HELO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:03:12 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E51820C3E for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:02:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:02:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=8ZyQLbrFPBaIpR9xJyamgErdDjI=; b=Gh3YnivNy3HB7vH1T1e0cPREwhk0 H/arit/jCmHLVJNs8Ob0oDgujebBCgtQF/aTrQMspqGZZNjGfAzJNrOZCGBy1FxF f6cj9aWwOHjyfqucCYCfu6JBGNWpV3/wyCvuY/PjI4VoC6EUu3ZmkUDGKaJa1xg8 p+ZNeO6IXp+42ek= X-Sasl-enc: jxD1IvIiQ+EfE70OVAx5GwPiJlHsCdTkZXdo/uV5F8HL 1318208569 Received: from localhost (unknown [123.51.25.138]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4059CC0319 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:02:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:02:35 +1100 From: David Crossley To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table Message-ID: <20111010010235.GC12988@igg.local> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i sebb wrote: > Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > >>>>> I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet. > >>> > >>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout > >>> changes. You are already working on the next steps :-) > >> > >> I'm not keen on losing the RH podling list, if that's what you mean; I > >> think it's useful. > > > > You was the only one who said so so far. WIth the bootstrap layout the > > project/index.html is even more readable than before. I reckon that it is important that the list of current podlings continues to be prominently displayed. Go to separate tables for further information. > >> Introducing the podlings.xml file is independent of any layout changes. > >> The idea here is to centralise and simplify maintenance of podling > >> summary details. > > > > Yes I understand that. But this thread is/was about layout changes. > > This xml can be used for many things. > > > >> > >>> BTW, I have made a copy of the podlings.xml file because probably we > >>> want to use that for some javascript magic. Of course, transforming it > >>> to JSON would make things easier. > >> > >> Easier for Javascript maybe; not so easy for XSLT, and might be harder > >> for clutch. > >> > >> However, we could easily convert to JSON for the published version of the file. > > > > Transformation to both formats are possible of course > > It's really a question of which format is easiest to maintain. > > Although JSON is simpler, it does not allow comments AFAIK, which I > think rules it out as a suitable original source file. > Also, there are currently more tools to work with XML, again AFAIK. > > > > >>>> > >>>> And I won't now have time until Sunday earliest. > >> > >> Actually, I did already commit a sample XSLT, however it is not yet > >> integrated into the build process. > > > > Yes saw it. > > > > I have added my layout changes too (website not updated). We need to > > find a consens on the rh table. I am still not a fan of this, it > > simply ugly. We have spoken on this thread about generating some kind > > of projects list from the podlings.xml file. It could show a some kind > > of dropdown menu from javascript. would you accept this als > > alternative? > > That would probably be fine - I'd like to see it before endorsing it fully. It would have been better to do it in a branch. The current half-finished changes have made it difficult for the Incubator to operate. There are uncommitted generated docs changes for all pages. So real content changes are troublesome. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org