Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A423B7224 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30619 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2011 19:46:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30407 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2011 19:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30399 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2011 19:46:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:46:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:46:09 +0000 Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so1660881ywf.6 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:45:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8hGPxrI+RZzitGOtuY9OrKhapGFUVKEYci0SAHofrvU=; b=aJeoXANGqkTmGHQjrOvtscN1Sr2LTJHWAnaNYfrSQPKKCnSv6ysFdiuyx6IufPlXtO lLOF7p1xKdl5aUjEJGtKzI5Nm7M8K/owyRj4sugM8HMgz1U6NkH4RETxuB2JLOFNx4Aw N1jMYVMpklZWYOmuWyo2IY0sKeWYth5hbquJE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.92.2 with SMTP id u2mr414808ybl.356.1316029549090; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.218.10 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:45:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E71040B.1090407@gmail.com> References: <4E6FB152.10100@gmail.com> <4E70FE01.7000806@ping.de> <4E71040B.1090407@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:45:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenNLP IP clearance question From: Benson Margulies To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You probably don't need BOTH an SGA or a CCLA. Just one. A CCLA allows future contributions. The SGA would just cover this one thing. On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, J=C3=B6rn Kottmann wr= ote: > On 9/14/11 9:18 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: >> >> He worked on it "during his day job" and nobody legally representing the >> company(?) did "sign a software grant" or indicate agreement with the >> contribution otherwise, correct? Can there be any other answer to your >> question than no? > > Thanks for you answer, then we need to insist that his VP signs the softw= are > grant > and CCLA. Is there anything else we need to get signed? > > The ICLA is already on file. > > J=C3=B6rn > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org