Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lutter@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release deltacloud 0.4.0, rc3
From: David Lutterkort <lutter@redhat.com>
To: deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:10:45 -0700
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VY_zkcwV-3q4MUwroaobcPy=HqTR3d5=dmuvK8fZiqUQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1314141706.14089.53.camel@avon.watzmann.net>
	 <CAOGo0VbEmcYs_qNX=zdU3pgfDH+7S7M9DsYCFyJyxokrsSRV+g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAOGo0VY_zkcwV-3q4MUwroaobcPy=HqTR3d5=dmuvK8fZiqUQA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat Inc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1314209446.913.17.camel@melon.watzmann.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:52 +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 24 August 2011 15:13, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 24 August 2011 00:21, David Lutterkort <lutter@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just uploaded the third release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.0. The rc is
> >> available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.0/rc3/
> >>
> >> Please vote on the release candidate by Friday, 2011-08-26 15:00 PDT
> >>
> >
> > Where is the KEYS file?
> >
> > Where is the SVN tag?
> >
> 
> There are some inconsistencies in the archives.
> 
> The NOTICE files in both archives mention redhat, yet there is no
> corresponding mention in the license file.
> If the archive(s) contain redhat code, then the LICENSE must be
> updated. If there is no redhat code included, then the NOTICE file
> must be updated to remove the reference - it's important that the
> NOTICE file only contains required notices.

My understanding was that the NOTICE file lists copyright holders - the
reference to Red Hat is there because the initial code grant came from
Red Hat; since the grant was under the ASL, I don't understand why that
would need to be called out separately in the LICENSE file.

In any event, is there anywhere on the ASF website that clearly
articulates what goes into the NOTICE and LICENSE file ? All the
references I looked at are concerned more with the why than with the
how.

> There are some files without AL headers (and no other license), for example:
> 
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/bin/deltacloudd
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/config/addresses.xml
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/config/condor.yaml
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/config/drivers/*.yaml
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/lib/deltacloud/base_driver/exceptions.rb
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/lib/deltacloud/drivers/mock/data/conv.rb
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/lib/deltacloud/drivers/rhevm/rhevm_client.rb
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/lib/deltacloud/drivers/vsphere/vsphere_client.rb
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/lib/deltacloud/drivers/vsphere/vsphere_filemanager.rb
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/lib/sinatra/rack_syslog.rb
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/public/javascripts/application.js
> deltacloud-core-0.4.0/public/stylesheets/new.css
> 
> There are quite a few .yml files as well; not sure if those allow
> comments or not

I'll add AL headers to the code files listed above (deltacloudd, *.rb,
*.js, *.css) The YAML and XML files are simply data, and therefore not
copyrightable by themselves in any event - I am following the precedent
of how httpd ships its config files w/o license headers.

> The client archive does not have any AL headers in the yml files, but
> otherwise seems OK.

Same here.

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org