incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Date Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:45:37 GMT
The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball
contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
missing headers today as well.

A.

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>
> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> or [developer list](
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>
> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>
> Why is this not a .txt file?
>
> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find
> RC1
> >> at
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >
> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >
> >> Website should update shortly.
> >
> > No sign yet.
> >
> >> A.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
> I'll
> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones
> that
> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >>>
> >>>  A.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
> files
> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're
> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc -
> these
> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> something.
> >>>>
> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under
> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN,
> same
> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> built/used,
> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are
> any
> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >>>>
> >>>> A.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
(3
> working
> >>>>> days
> >>>>> > from now)
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> >>>>> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to
SVN
> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop
> >>>>> website.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not
a
> >>>>> blocker).
> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed
> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left
> >>>>> dangling.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive -
I
> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory
> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories
> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc.  This makes it very difficult to check
> the
> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
> release:
> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sig is OK
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after
a
> >>>>> successful
> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > A.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message