incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:24:12 GMT
Hi -

The POM is actually just for site generation currently. In the next release,
we'll probably have Maven artifacts to release as well, though.

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Francis De Brabandere
<francisdb@gmail.com>wrote:

> You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
> using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
> >>
> >> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> >> details required for the new vote?
> >>
> >> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >> >>
> >> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >> >>
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> >> .
> >> >> >> The
> >> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are
Debian
> >> packaging
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md
has
> >> been
> >> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least
for now,
> >> >> excluded
> >> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball
has
> >> been
> >> >> >> built
> >> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update
that shortly.
> The
> >> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having
built the tar
> on
> >> OS
> >> >> X -
> >> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe.
I'll try to
> get
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains
the following:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics
> )
> >> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >> >>>
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> >> ).
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0
with RC1. In any case,
> >> please
> >> >> >> find
> >> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files,
which should be
> >> excluded.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew
Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE
now as well. The
> .gitignore
> >> >> files -
> >> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level
one from the tarball,
> but
> >> the
> >> >> >> ones
> >> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the
build process.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>  A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM,
Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing
the headers? I know there
> are
> >> >> some
> >> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones
I know of are that way
> because
> >> >> >> they're
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats,
they don't allow
> >> comments,
> >> >> etc
> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging
files, unless I'm
> >> missing
> >> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents -
as far as I can tell,
> >> everything
> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The
contents there are the same
> as
> >> in
> >> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content
under test is not yet
> >> being
> >> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized
later, but it's all there. If
> >> there
> >> >> >> are
> >> >> >> >>> any
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's
in SVN, let me know and I'll
> >> check
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >>> out.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48
PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25,
Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator
release for Apache Bigtop,
> >> >> version
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following
issues:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download,
test, and vote by Wednesday,
> August
> >> 24
> >> >> (3
> >> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> days
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now)
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting
on the source (tag).
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums,
signature:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't
have any license headers.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in
the archive; needs also to be
> >> added
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> SVN
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must
also be prominently displayed
> on
> >> the
> >> >> >> bigtop
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> website.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed
before a release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly
different layout from
> normal
> >> >> (not
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker).
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if
the paragraph were wrapped after
> >> >> >> "developed
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done
- because the URL would then
> not
> >> be
> >> >> >> left
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore
files to be included
> in
> >> the
> >> >> >> source
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem
with the packaging of the
> >> archive
> >> >> - I
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to
be under the top-level
> directory
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating,
but there are also parallel
> >> >> directories
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc.
 This makes it very
> difficult
> >> to
> >> >> >> check
> >> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source
archive.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs
to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted
on:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file,
containing the PGP keys used to
> sign
> >> the
> >> >> >> >>> release:
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator
PMC needs to vote on the
> release
> >> >> after
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any
release can be made official.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands,
e-mail:
> >> >> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message