incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:37:54 GMT
Tags are supposed to be immutable.

For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
when the vote succeeds.

Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.

Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.

[BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]

On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tag replaced.
>
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > New candidate up at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
>> The
>> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> files
>> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
>> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> built
>> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >
>> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>>
>> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>>
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> tarball
>> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
>> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the
>> files
>> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >>
>> >> A.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >>> list](
>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >>> or [developer list](
>> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >>>
>> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >>>
>> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
please
>> find
>> >>> RC1
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> A.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
files -
>> >>> I'll
>> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball,
but the
>> ones
>> >>> that
>> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>  A.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.bayer@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know
there are some
>> >>> files
>> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way
because
>> they're
>> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
comments, etc
>> -
>> >>> these
>> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
missing
>> >>> something.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
everything is
>> >>> under
>> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the
same as in
>> SVN,
>> >>> same
>> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not
yet being
>> >>> built/used,
>> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there.
If there
>> are
>> >>> any
>> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and
I'll check it
>> >>> out.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> A.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache
Bigtop, version
>> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday,
August 24 (3
>> >>> working
>> >>> >>>>> days
>> >>> >>>>> > from now)
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also
to be added to
>> SVN
>> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed
on the
>> bigtop
>> >>> >>>>> website.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout
from normal (not
>> a
>> >>> >>>>> blocker).
>> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped
after
>> "developed
>> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would
then not be
>> left
>> >>> >>>>> dangling.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included
in the
>> source
>> >>> >>>>> release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging
of the archive - I
>> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level
directory
>> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel
directories
>> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc.  This makes it very
difficult to
>> check
>> >>> the
>> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on:
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys
used to sign the
>> >>> release:
>> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> sig is OK
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote
on the release after
>> a
>> >>> >>>>> successful
>> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Thanks!
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > A.
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message