incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.0 RC 3
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:45:30 GMT
On 2011-08-07, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

> Release candidate 3 for Apache Lucy (incubating) version 0.2.0 can
> be found at:

>     http://people.apache.org/~marvin/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3/

> See the CHANGES file at the top level of the archive for information about the
> content of this release.

No kind of functional testing performed, just the normal sanity checks.

PGP verification passes with the KEYS file found in
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucy/KEYS - MD5 sum looks good as
well.  What kind of SHA algo has been used for the .sha file?  I've
tried all sha*sum tools on my Ubuntu box but neither returns a result
that looks close to your .sha file.

LICENSE and NOTICE look good, tag and tarball are identical, there are
100 files where RAT doesn't recognize the license (because it doesn't
recognize the ICU license for example).  A report created with RAT's
current trunk and Ant can be found here

http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3.rat.txt

Yes, I've seen the excludes file but didn't want to allow you any
cheating ;-)

Inside the snowstem module there are a few files that don't carry a
"this file is generated" notice but not any sort of license either, I
guess these should be fixed (maybe for the next release as you'll likely
get enough +1s anyway).

Rest looks good to me.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message