Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F12714BCD for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11688 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 22:12:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11550 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 22:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11542 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 22:12:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:12:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robert_weir@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.150 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.150] (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:12:45 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p52M0nL4026935 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:00:49 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id p52MCLK9127604 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:12:22 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p52GBrJY019904 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:11:53 -0600 Received: from wtfmail03.edc.lotus.com (WTFMAIL03.lotus.com [9.32.140.19]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p52GBo4N019746 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:11:51 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <20110602000137.GA60771@devsys.jaguNET.com> <4DE6D6E9.8080609@apache.org> <4DE76850.2060905@documentfoundation.org> <2D234AC2-791A-4BD9-9B71-B93610164604@jaguNET.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines... X-KeepSent: E0A87084:45E6B554-852578A3:00795AD9; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V852_05272010 May 27, 2010 From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:12:17 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WTFMAIL03/WTF/M/Lotus(Release 8.5.2FP3NP|April 26, 2011) at 06/02/2011 06:12:19 PM, Serialize complete at 06/02/2011 06:12:19 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Greg Stein wrote on 06/02/2011 05:45:57 PM: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:55, wrote: > > dsh wrote on 06/02/2011 04:44:26 PM: > > > >> > >> IMHO "the project" is "on track" the community just needs to discuss > >> some more things and sort them out. It is just that I don't even think > >> it's required to provide proof-points based on "questionable" > >> analytics at this point in time. There is a saying in this regards "I > >> only believe in statistics that I doctored myself" and that's > >> certainly one reason why I feel suspicious about these kind of > >> analysis :) > >> > > > > Questionable? If only 54 people have checked in code in the last 6 > > months, then no amount of magic with source code indentation is going to > > get you to 400 developers. If you disagree, I'd like to see the magic you > > can do with the tab key! > > Rob: does this need to continue? > If we're all now satisfied of the plausibility of growing a sufficiently large developer base this code base, and no one is still maintaining that we need hundreds of developers, then I think we're done. -Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org