Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 657496FDB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62951 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:03:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62803 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62795 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:03:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:03:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of robert_weir@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.137 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.137] (HELO e7.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:03:34 +0000 Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p53HdRJV029761 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:39:27 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p53I3C7g100866 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:03:12 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p53E2x5x009350 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:02:59 -0300 Received: from wtfmail03.edc.lotus.com (WTFMAIL03.lotus.com [9.32.140.19]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p53E2u4L008917 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:02:56 -0300 In-Reply-To: References: To: general@incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Apache OpenOffice.org Incubator Proposal: Collaboration with TDF/LO X-KeepSent: 8CCD10C1:E9FF8971-852578A4:0060DC1A; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V852_05272010 May 27, 2010 From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:03:06 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WTFMAIL03/WTF/M/Lotus(Release 8.5.2FP3NP|April 26, 2011) at 06/03/2011 02:03:07 PM, Serialize complete at 06/03/2011 02:03:07 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm perceiving that we're circling around on the same points with no new options coming up. So I'd like to record the state of the issue. If there is consensus on this formulation, I'll place it in the wiki. Of course, if the discussion advances the issue or positions move, I can always go back and revise, -Rob =Collabration with LibreOffice= LibreOffice uses a dual licesne LGPLv3/MPL. This limits the degree to which OpenOffice and LibreOffice can collaborate on code. However, we would be glad to discuss, as a project, ways in which we can collaborate with them in a way that respects the chosen licenses of both projects. This could include collaboration on jointly sponsored public events, interoperability 'plugfests', standards, shared build management infrastructure, etc. And if TDF decides at a later point to change to a compatible license, then this would open up additional ways in which we could collaborate, and we would welcome that as well. We believe that in practice, the extent to which we may actually collaborate will be determined by the licence compatibility issue rather than any unwillingness to collaborate. ------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org