Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A25F6C0E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56597 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:19:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56386 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:19:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56377 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 20:19:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:19:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:19:12 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2412718bwz.6 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sC52tIj50AyVw0R8qYdXyeCld2r4pQzhfckuNRGKvHI=; b=ZiM2urJYI8xPmUFJ/lQ22PS02K+NA9uEbAyEyo+k/xYVDN+BjMYVtiNoLxoGcyt9Mp bsSH6O8/8EfEBQaK8Xk8ljTx/E+3Byb4vbDeKywalFLhX54INex3bZmbejkTywIbDM6B I1HhfaaTPOOHbSFEYy2sAkt4gVMhIQLDywZis= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YdjLAGOySsgZAxe8ZH0ivOlKVF/Oj5P+m0QihA9hv+lk8uDUrdi3/kpE8XRHf9L7Vo hkJLq10SsLGcL2DgZekOPsp73XdUmDon/zpI1Y5lJXVbK1eR3DDhsO0tAo5uCSfgRsX0 8+EDDCi0T1pBxPv7MP8O4DmCH3Gr7sQdqoNXM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.50.66 with SMTP id y2mr2440240bkf.81.1307132331766; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.69.204 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:18:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: A possibly gratuitous meta- thread on the open office discussion From: Benson Margulies To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We now have several running threads. They overlap in content, and their subjects are, in some cases, rather uninformative. I want to suggest some options to improve this situation to make it easier for ipmc members (and others) to follow the discussion and register their points of view. Option 1: a champion of the proposal takes inventory and starts a number of meaningfully-labeled threads for the subjects of ongoing discussion, and we all try to resist the urge to respond further in the original set. For those existing threads that have a coherent subject line and content, they could just be endorsed. Option 2: we use the wiki to stack up comments and concerns about the proposal. That does make it easier for anyone to show up and survey the territory. Option 3: you all ignore me, as is your privilege. If this were an in-person meeting, and I were the moderator (and pigs had wings ...) I'd be trying to sort out the areas of material disagreement and concern and focus attention onto them and away from everything else. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org