Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 225234D43 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36021 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 22:35:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35866 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 22:35:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35858 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 22:35:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:35:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,GAPPY_SUBJECT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of motley.crue.fan@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:35:31 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1563780bwz.6 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:35:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AK5M4kRDMzxx/K0BDF2R8zWOmd82SzNS4PRFSsOLk0w=; b=LH5TYSN9QSlqyOwtFDsfx3YLujLRb5hxN+xKWYZczi6ePpbCr8YX4Dwud1luFvYd3O Z9YJeS/GavV1T+9ZkTYsOkmHjVZXPF/4fTl0nOPvQfEHh9NO7GUMla2A1ZFq18QHT6sj xGs9uSHYOXgd4qe4iTpUsWfA8T74tw0am15VI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=btXCOByu5xwgn6FZ/aN/n892Qn3dAMrojMkYPt9SlKxru1GsswWOxtKc1K/iZNJZni udfv9Hn40qJsVsYuG2msMR3P9APqkDPuvZL47/PT01fRK4kEc2Oct5cmfo/EVapmGak6 WfZDkwsbz8TnkyWpjYx0JAWDfgL4Uty6AJh1A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.233.11 with SMTP id jw11mr1235666bkb.32.1307054110979; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.52.1 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DE7DE06.6080500@documentfoundation.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:35:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HREUNITING the Community? From: Phillip Rhodes To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3979da2afcb63504a4c23fde X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b3979da2afcb63504a4c23fde Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > This whole topic seems to suffer from malformed or uninformative subject > lines. > > I submit that it's not the purview of the ASF or the Incubator PMC to > achieve world peace, or whirled peas, or a single project for open > source document software. > > Oracle has granted code to the ASF. A group of people have made a > proposal to launch a podling based on that granted code. The incubator > has criteria for judging proposals. They relate to the probability of > the successful creation of a self-sustaining Apache project. > > The existing of TDF and the preference of its contributors for > copyleft is data, but for me it's not data that could persuade me to > vote -1 in this PMC. I don't care if there are 5,000 people out there > who are firmly planning to stick to TDF like glue. I care if there are > 10 or 20 who are prepared to take this on. > +1 Phil --485b3979da2afcb63504a4c23fde--