Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BFEF445F for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44267 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 22:54:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44109 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 22:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44101 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 22:54:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:54:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ianrlynch@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:54:51 +0000 Received: by vws2 with SMTP id 2so2371970vws.6 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:54:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8X/R+wYy06jS+j8e4q6aAHekVcmQYzwPheTuiGJdWgk=; b=ANWnRaPsKUQ6g4/oZbhBD5fV3Y2WirMk+yx8877n75U+BIQdxnapkWaUkWiWxeEEmT otibpKR9QOMEbGoIj9Os4k0LmRAgV4m9Qtxpu8McHzOS7NMlAQWucSEzrVdAv4Ptr4mf aOeIe4UKZM/rvgBbX3aFnPTEKYyddIOvwJKL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JSEhsR7NJGMSZTePu3oIA07qA2b/AuCl4UI2z6rerh96XwiKRacYPcYT+PqJIh8XG+ ujdtXrqHe8l880ZgKErJ/F0ETldIaJUUpM+qguvLx6tPfxlM1SX0M0oaTzUbk7oBy2QK FpcadufpUxvrG9SPwXbAPAmwm7nlz/j/SZXqU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.177.166 with SMTP id cr6mr1959414vdc.151.1307228070028; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.167.41 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.167.41 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:54:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEAB6A2.6010205@oracle.com> References: <009001cc22e9$73f6cbe0$5be463a0$@acm.org> <4DEAB6A2.6010205@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:54:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OO/LO License From: Ian Lynch To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071ccaac125a404a4eac00a --20cf3071ccaac125a404a4eac00a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Agreed. The main problem is if say the majority of knowledgeable developers only want their work licensed copyleft. On 4 Jun 2011 23:50, "Andrew Rist" wrote: On 6/4/2011 11:58 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > Just to un-muddy the waters a little, it shoul... The code was used under multiple licenses. While it may be true that LGPL was the only Open Source license, it was not in fact the only license. The choice of ALv2 going forward would ensure continuity for all constituencies under a single well accepted open source license, with all parties on equal footing. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene... --20cf3071ccaac125a404a4eac00a--