Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2939A643C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84975 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:21:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84850 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:21:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84842 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:21:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:21:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of simon@webmink.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:21:14 +0000 Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so3780268qyk.6 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.45.1 with SMTP id c1mr1788907qcf.259.1307136053695; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:20:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.233.131 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [81.2.79.172] In-Reply-To: References: From: Simon Phipps Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice.org Incubator Proposal: Collaboration with TDF/LO To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363ba07227575904a4d55444 --0016363ba07227575904a4d55444 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, dsh > wrote: > >> > > >> > Besides that, I was asking myself why Rob is the only one who could > >> > add such a tone to the proposal? If there would be consensus that open > >> > and proactive collaboration with other parties is important it's up to > >> > the community to add such a tone to the proposal. > >> > > >> > What do you think? > >> > >> The reason it is a wiki is exactly for this reason. Go for it! > > > > What are the exact rules, Sam? Those of us who aren't insiders will be > very > > reticent indeed about editing. > > Rules? :-) > > From http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html : > > "The incoming community needs to work together before presenting this > proposal to the incubator. Think about and discuss future goals and > the reasons for coming to Apache. Feel free to ask questions on list." > Got any special rules for where the incoming community is already divided? :-) > As long as people are constructive and working together, there will be > no interference. If it turns out that there are groups with multiple > visions, we can split this page into separate proposals. Defacement > of the proposal will be quickly reverted. > So to be clear, the wiki page for the OOo proposal is open for anyone to edit and not just Apache members or the project's proposers. S. --0016363ba07227575904a4d55444--