Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59F584C3E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 03:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50069 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 03:59:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49938 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 03:59:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49127 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 03:59:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:59:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:58:56 +0000 Received: by vxd7 with SMTP id 7so2858725vxd.6 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:58:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z1lhqZ7yucglcduBEfxtvXBCpuVXoMNLMLbjOrR4UK8=; b=iNzxosXpGMBZMKC3kTeGEGBa9ZwAIiCYoyF5LMdVapUWMHNqW9QMHmPUBZWNbrNCAz /c1IAU7hOL4vMftoHkMoLqRPM64M0O1uwXatlSaZaCbErcKzXPYxE1ZfiNX4mAOiZWEF SgC3tTLJLGewsZGIIrFXWJAEQgPGbjudfY66Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LCu6I20ltWenTu36XCIgRaDMTExxOU3MqCbn+H3E2+GUPYdAla7IFJkGjni7XsFXg8 LWGGjsn+IlbxPyliWMYpuUVX8ynHq2qxWRvWNjtsb1R2iTmZfPnnrm20EkjV//fY7e5a Ub1/NvknnZlaZyk2jDJUt3uv8iABi9OUd/aJ4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.65.231 with SMTP id a7mr1929131vdt.61.1307332715740; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.162.226 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:58:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <014601cc23fd$038f6910$0aae3b30$@acm.org> References: <014601cc23fd$038f6910$0aae3b30$@acm.org> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:58:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Legal concern: Are we getting to close ot a "division of markets" conversation? From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org, dennis.hamilton@acm.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Right. In short, there is no way to "divide the market" when you're talking about ALv2 licensing. Everybody has equal access to very permissively-licensed software. It is not a worry. Move along, please. Cheers, -g On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 23:51, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > The problem here is that Rob and Sam and other well-known employees are b= eing addressed as IBM employees here and even called to account for their e= mployer's behavior and intentions by some of the participants. =A0I suggest= that the best way to deal with those requests is to meet them with silence= and those of us who know better should stop asking those questions. > > Furthermore, the competition laws that apply to Rob and Sam as IBM employ= ees and their agreements with their employer are not waived by their having= a different hat here. =A0They can't get out of it, just like a priest (or = parishioner) can't avoid causing scandal by misbehaving in plain clothes. = =A0They can operate as individuals but they must also honor the requirement= s on their conduct that are a consequence of their employment. > > However, this is not a secret conversation and it is not about arrangemen= ts to exclude third parties (except the absent elephant that shall not be n= amed, and I don't see how that can happen under a transparent Alv2 setup an= yhow -- au contraire). =A0Furthermore, it is not clear to me that anything = that happens here can create a "division of markets." > > I think this can be more grounded by talking about specific actions that = are called for in finalizing the proposal and in anticipating the essential= work for taking over the OpenOffice.org code base, related artifacts, and = making them available under ALv2, whether or not we ever make a distributio= n that is called Apache OpenOffice.org. > > I have too many more thoughts, but it is time to take the trash to the cu= rb and then feed the cats. =A0So you are spared for now [;<). > > =A0- Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Norbert Thiebaud [mailto:nthiebaud@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 20:31 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Legal concern: Are we getting to close ot a "division of mar= kets" conversation? > > [ ... ] > > And these law apply to non-for-profit organization ? The Red-Cross and Un= ited Way cannot agree to 'Divide Territories' ? They have by law the obliga= tion to 'compete' for the potential recipient of their charity ? > > Isn't Apache a non-for-profit ? > > If I understand the 'Apache Way', I'd say you are wearing a 'Corporate' h= at in this email, not your 'Apache member' hat > > Norbert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org