Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 492CC6DCA for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39912 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 00:16:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39754 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 00:16:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39746 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 00:16:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:16:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of keithcu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:16:51 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1423194gyf.6 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DgklCYjykXHkzNi9uBz3nps9FFZQ27Zeuuw8Okvrzfs=; b=WGbDce9eked+PsPurSD4KvSwlDnfv3tvFJ8oz+BPQ5+YzF5IA0fRinOE9oANZKD2z9 aNH2v2IKH39A0o1ADe3hJXDs9T/52p3lgg5PImtBcVhS8gNLtu8kodz4UIayJBbkb1ka rrkoBdM0mdxsyhNBmTaKqe3O/f8Oee72oll7g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vTCmJn4JuJYhYRnlxeinSx2+Jv9BNkjjw0NtqvJnWuE+DKLS3bpbQv+XckIKU8uwu8 JSY/fSlmlOkbV0VTQ7oPohm96IwZ+dFIbY5gPYcHVWJIpKwGn5pmNI+RCkv7Zpvy3wwi xpuH3iIjnviXaTvbLTLRF7GiOJwpXmBncJlkc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.193.98 with SMTP id j62mr5575798yhn.46.1307319390456; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.102.170 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:16:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7C8BE1BD-2C4B-40B4-8C00-F0E1077D5D07@comcast.net> References: <4DEBC130.1050400@rowe-clan.net> <484176.56725.qm@web161428.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <687530.74080.qm@web161425.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <659738.49970.qm@web161424.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <551537.9555.qm@web161422.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <997848.24398.qm@web161422.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <26611A62-A0DF-4E5E-98A1-4E74DD0A4852@comcast.net> <7C8BE1BD-2C4B-40B4-8C00-F0E1077D5D07@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:16:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenOffice & LibreOffice From: Keith Curtis To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Keith Curtis wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>> You have recipient and donor roles reversed. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_donor#Red_blood_cell_compatibility >>> >>> Search the archives for some of Sam Ruby's emails. >> >> I learned this in 6th grade and still remember it. Anyway, the larger >> point seems that the Linux kernel is a better type-O because it >> accepts all kinds of changes. > > The statement was ASL is a universal "donor", in the blood analogy a type O-. > > You are saying that it is best to be a universal recipient - in blood terms AB+. Not type O. I think it depends on who is the donor and who is the recipient in this analogy because there is code flowing in both directions, but my point here is that the Linux kernel situation is more pragmatic in that it works with code of multiple licenses. I just want you to think about sharing bug lists. Etc. LibreOffice has your latest code already integrated, I believe. Given LibreOffice's success, and the fact that it has just built everything you need, this has the potential to cause confusion and wasted efforts. You can do an infinite amount of proprietary or Apache software on top of LibreOffice. I think some should think about building Notes and Symphony on top LibreOffice. That is plenty of work and will provide big benefits. -Keith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org